• Welcome to Elio Owners! Join today, registration is easy!

    You can register using your Google, Facebook, or Twitter account, just click here.

My Elio Alternate Project Is Underway.

Mark BEX

Elio Addict
Joined
Feb 2, 2021
Messages
1,174
Reaction score
4,645
Location
Australia
shouldn't those struts help keep both front tires on the ground during cornering

Not sure I understand ...

The struts are part of a triangulated system to locate the wheels consistently relative to the chassis, while the struts themselves allow the wheels to move move vertically while driving over uneven surfaces.
 

JEBar

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Aug 24, 2014
Messages
7,287
Reaction score
18,111
Location
Wake County, NC
a few days ago AriLea posted a link to a YouTube video about the new generation Meserschmitt reverse trike .... at 1:03 in the video you can see the right front tire lift in a turn .... it appears that is a common issue that needs to be dealt with in the design of reverse trikes ....from what I've seen, struts do well


 

3wheelin

Elio Addict
Joined
May 29, 2015
Messages
1,683
Reaction score
1,928
Location
USA
Oh, Oh I feel a lecture coming onn..... This is not for us, but for any poor future person who looks at this thread.
So skip this for those active in this thread right now, as past Elio fans you already know this...

The most common mistake in trikes... and the KR (3 wheel) series falls into this, the center of gravity is toward the powered single tire.
That is where the power is, so if the CG is too far forward, well that is trouble too. Especially in turns. Especially in bad weather.

Everything is fine and dandy until your speed get's over some limit based on the CG location, both horizontally and vertically. The issue first crops up in turns, but can happen anytime there is a dynamic transfer of weight.

In the video, it's common to see a tire lift, and a driver who is ready for it is just fine.
But above the threshold speed, no driver can react fast enough, or may not have the room to maneuver for recovery.
For the KR202, I will guess to place that threshold at 40-MPH, where you need some prior skill for a growing number of incidences.
And maybe 55-MPH for the expert driver, and maybe 65-70 for the super expert if he keeps his cool. (all depending on the radius of the turn, i.e. the side-loading from a dynamic transfer of weight). I'm not even addressing over-steer/understeer!!

"THE KR200 SUPER-SPORT” BROKE THE 24-HOUR 1,000 MILE RECORD [AVERAGE SPEED 77.7 MPH] AND SET 21 NEW EDURANCE RECORDS, WHEN IT RACED IN WEST GERMANY IN 1955." (Wiki-Link)

So of course, I advocate for a wide track, and low CG with !front wheel drive!. That way, with FWD, moving CG toward the front, the needs of traction and roll-over are not in conflict. 4 Wheelers don't have that particular conflicting issue. Single wheel forward trikes have even more issues.

Light loading the wheel, or actually lifting it is common for that vehicle design, and that driver was totally ready for it.
Again, at faster speeds above some limit, nobody can control that.

Sorry, about the intrusion, but it's very political how people defend their various interests in the different trike platforms. Dis-information is rampant. Frankly, I am not political about it. I'm expressing factual physics.

Totally agree with you on your physics analysis regarding any "rear wheel" powered 3wheelers. That's my worry on Electra Meccanica SOLO. On top of that, here's Motor Trend's review of how the rear wheel bounces:


Its 82 hp may not be much, but given the sub-2,000-pound curb weight and Smart-sized dimensions, I expected the Solo to feel quick. It didn't. Pin the throttle to the floorboard—pretty much the only way the Solo gets going with any urgency—and the always-on traction-control system limits torque to prevent the rear tire from breaking loose.


Throttle input during normal driving generally results in the Solo's back end bouncing upward as the rear axle and suspension struggle with the motor's torque. Get off the throttle, and the suspension and axle unload rapidly. As a result, quick throttle changes—like you might experience in heavy stop-and-go traffic—result in the ElectraMeccanica pogoing up and down, a lot like Mercedes' "bouncy-bounce" off-road mode found on the GLE and GLS SUVs.'

It doesn't appear much thought went into the way the Solo turns or stops; it doesn't feel as engaging as it looks like it would be. There's little in the way of feedback or feel from the power steering system, and its slow Jeep Wrangler-like steering ratio means even simple maneuvers, like reversing into a parking spot, require lots of steering input.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2021-5-7_12-24-28.png
    upload_2021-5-7_12-24-28.png
    5.1 KB · Views: 108

AriLea

Elio Addict
Joined
Mar 20, 2014
Messages
3,863
Reaction score
9,876
Location
anywhere
I'd say the Solo issues can be repaired by mods to the car. It wouldn't be too difficult to add $5k in hardware including Front twin motors, extended rear fork, wider AArms at the front. $10k if you contract some of the work. But by then the car has cost $27k.
(add some more battery up front to move the CG, +$4K = $31K or better; fine for a one-off eye catcher)
But it would work hugely better on the freeways at that point. You would in effect be using the Solo as a body and power pack donor.
__Solo.jpg
__solo2.jpg

__1227_DIFF_DUAL_REMY_HVH-250-90-SOM_1.jpg

I don't know if you could apply that to a Sparrow, but that doesn't look as easy to me. (and Yup Fugly for the money)
__Sparrow.jpg

It does seem just as easy to rip the middle out of some used car to produce a tandem or solo body to host a drive train suitable for freeway speeds, as Mark is doing.
__68e79f.jpg
 
Last edited:

3wheelin

Elio Addict
Joined
May 29, 2015
Messages
1,683
Reaction score
1,928
Location
USA
I'd say the Solo issues can be repaired by mods to the car. It wouldn't be too difficult to add $5k in hardware including Front twin motors, extended rear fork, wider AArms at the front. $10k if you contract some of the work. But by then the car has cost $27k.
(add some more battery up front to move the CG, +$4K = $31K or better; fine for a one-off eye catcher)
But it would work hugely better on the freeways at that point. You would in effect be using the Solo as a body and power pack donor.
View attachment 24797 View attachment 24798
View attachment 24799
I don't know if you could apply that to a Sparrow, but that doesn't look as easy to me. (and Yup Fugly for the money)
View attachment 24800
It does seem just as easy to rip the middle out of some used car to produce a tandem or solo body to host a drive train suitable for freeway speeds, as Mark is doing.
View attachment 24801
Now the Polaris Slingshot is a front engine but rear-wheel drive also, 2.0 liter 4cyl, 170hp, 120 ft lb of torque and weighs only 1,663lb- I wonder how the rear SINGLE wheel handles all that power?? How stable it is in turns specially on wet weather conditions?
 

Mark BEX

Elio Addict
Joined
Feb 2, 2021
Messages
1,174
Reaction score
4,645
Location
Australia
I think we're gonna need to change the forum name to "BEX Owners" soon :D

Gotta get in there and make 'em first, no false gods here .... :-)


Sorry for lack of updates the last few days, the holiday week has finished here, I didn't mean to get caught up in it, but I did, a bit more travel, a few lunches and drinks with friends, etc, but back to the car full time tomorrow.
 
Last edited:

Mark BEX

Elio Addict
Joined
Feb 2, 2021
Messages
1,174
Reaction score
4,645
Location
Australia
Getting through the front chassis frame and strut mounts a bit at a time.

Don't worry that it's a but ugly and messy at the moment, lots will be trimmed back, some lasered plates rather than tubes, and some removed later.

I have to use some bolts at the moment because I can't know at the moment how the engine and driveline weight will ultimately affect the ground clearance, so may have to move the strut mounts up or down later accordingly.

mac5.jpg
 
Top Bottom