Good point. EV's Achilles heel is it's battery obviously but tech is moving forward and someday in the future, the battery maybe small enough to be swappable and not built in! In the meantime, EV works for people that can afford them and will only make a small dent on it's gas counterpart's market dominance.I just did a little looking around and yes, I see that current draw for A/C and EV charging is similar. Yes, A/C is on during the day but typically I think the brownouts occur when people are returning from work and turning on their A/C when they get home. Isn't this exactly what you would be doing with your EV car? Furthermore, if you have limited range and make the 8 trips a day that many homes do then it seems that there would be a very high likelihood that you would be using the fast charge during the day between trips. If A/C and other electrical uses are already pushing our grid to failure then piling on EVs will only make things worse. I stand by my original assertion that EVs cannot scale without crippling our electric grid.
If we choose to ignore the issues with the grid we can talk about the efficiency of fueling with gas vs. electric. Sure, it may take some effort to get a new gas station built and put in place but for the most part the gas infrastructure is already there so this really isn't an issue. Additionally, it takes only minutes to fuel your gas car so several gas vehicles can move through the gas station in a short period of time.
Electric charging stations are not in very many places and the small number of EV users are already fighting over access to them; clearly the infrastructure to support large numbers of EVs is not in place. This leads to the next question of what it might take to create the infrastructure needed to charge large numbers of EVs (again,assuming the grid doesn't melt).
It takes hours to charge an EV so charging stations remain tied up for lengthy periods of time as opposed to gas cars that can fuel up in minutes and move out of the way. This means that if you want to charge a similar number of EVs vs. gas cars that you would need to have significantly more charging stations spread across a much larger area so that all of those EVs can be charging at the same time instead of just queued and moving through the gas station.
Charging stations at every parking spot would clearly be your nirvana but it simply is not economically feasible. Consider that of the charging stations that have been installed in Minneapolis; in order to be able to provide the necessary power they are grouped in small numbers in dedicated parking spaces. ALL of these have been installed and are being operated at a loss and only really exist because of taxpayer support. Subsidizing may work for a small number of people but simply won't scale to large numbers of EVs. In the meantime you have businesses and other drivers that are annoyed that prime parking spaces are unusable when they are empty and EV drivers that are pissed when that can't get access to the few charging stations available.
Each charging station requires the initial investment in the charger itself, the installation, power delivery, the ongoing maintenance, etc.. Who should pay for this? In the case of gas the gas station owner pays for the station, the pumps, the maintenance, the workers, etc and they expect to make their money back through gas and in store purchases. Due to the length of time to charge, the same density of customers does not exist for EV charging and without the density there is a loss of the additional in store sales. Also consider that because so many charging stations are needed vs fuel pumps that initial installation as well as maintenance costs will be staggering in comparison. I don't believe private industry could make the money necessary to support this and so I don't believe there would ever be a large number of EV charging stations available. Again, EVs work for small numbers but they simply can't scale.