I've asked Jbar to delete my previous post. I was just trying to make this forum "cleaner".
Sorry if I offended anyone.
Willie
Willie frustration isn't offensive in the way you presented it.
I understand. S'all good man.
Welcome to Elio Owners! Join today, registration is easy!
You can register using your Google, Facebook, or Twitter account, just click here.I've asked Jbar to delete my previous post. I was just trying to make this forum "cleaner".
Sorry if I offended anyone.
Willie
How much, if any amount of $, is no criteria for sharing.Well I have to say Willie not very fair because I spent months here before finally getting enough scratch for a deposit.
granted I have not been driving anyone crazy lately though or making random assessments or stereotypes but I'm still here.
Thank you for your input. Paul Elio is an engineer and we engineers (I am an engineer also) often do not have great business acumen. You said you were not confident with management. I would like to hear what you would like to have seen done differently. I would also like to know what you would do from this point forward. Thank you.I would like to see this vehicle produced. I have not posted in quite awhile because I am an accredidted investor and I filed to see the full disclosure. Since I take CDA's seriously I regarded it as unwise to offer any comments lest I inadvertently reveal confidential information. While I elected to not go "big" as an accredited investor during the first offering, I did plunk down $5k today.
I have mixed feelings about this whole endeavor. I was virtually certain that ATVM would not fund before Q1, 2015 and stated so here, but I thought surely that would be wrapped up. I doubt EM will actually sell the entire $25M offering of the current tranch and regard the odds that EM actually produces this as 50:50 or worse owing to difficulty in obtaining the working capital they need to get into production and threats to losing their production site.
The one upside to investing in such a risky offering is that at least I understand the business model: get $300M in capital and produce a vehicle folks will, in my view, surely prize. But that doesn't mean that I'm confident with management (I'm not) or that the prospects are just slightly better than bleak. So having negative things to say is not the same as being down on Elio Motors but likely reflects a sense of realism. We were told they would be well into production by now.....
Thank you for your input. Paul Elio is an engineer and we engineers (I am an engineer also) often do not have great business acumen. You said you were not confident with management. I would like to hear what you would like to have seen done differently. I would also like to know what you would do from this point forward. Thank you.
I'm hoping to put a hundred all in deposit this week. Don't know if I will be able to. Money is tight, and with holidays could be used for better memories. Would hate to think I would not be able to feel like a part of this community (of which I love you ALL), just because I don't have the scratch to join the club.
Thank you very much for your reply. I have said something similar but you have added new insight and pinpointed specifics like inflexibility on cost ($6800) and efficiency (84 mpg). I believe Paul will fully develop and test the vehicle and have it completely ready for production using current funding. Then, if he has the ATVM loan he will go into production using that money. If he does not have the ATVM loan, I believe he will pull from his desk (if he is smart) a list of interested wealthy investors who declined investment before because of the control issue. I believe he will call up these investors and offer to share control in return for their investment. At this point, investors will be less incline to change the design of a fully developed and tested vehicle.You are welcome, Pistonboy, and I would not regard engineers as bad businessfolks. I know more than a few who are quite adept at the skill of finding value and transacting it.
Paul's chief trouble is that he has been far too optimistic in my view, as visionaries often are, and clearly failed to appreciate how difficult it would be to secure the capital he needs to get his baby into production. Also like most visionaries (I'm thinking Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, and - sigh - Elon Musk here), Paul has had a problem letting go, which is absolutely related to his evident lack of success at attracting investment. This thing would have been funded and in production quite some time ago if he and his team had been willing to cede control. I don't think this is mere shrewdness but rather an acknowledgement that he had backed himself into a corner by adopting inflexible positions as to cost ($6800) and efficiency (84 mpg) that rendered the risk-reward potential unattractive relative to other competing opportunities angels and venture would consider. If Paul were to cede control cost would go up and efficiency would go down but the odds of getting something close on the real market would increase dramatically. As it stands we will get either what Paul promised or nothing at all.
You are welcome, Pistonboy, and I would not regard engineers as bad businessfolks. I know more than a few who are quite adept at the skill of finding value and transacting it.
Paul's chief trouble is that he has been far too optimistic in my view, as visionaries often are, and clearly failed to appreciate how difficult it would be to secure the capital he needs to get his baby into production. Also like most visionaries (I'm thinking Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, and - sigh - Elon Musk here), Paul has had a problem letting go, which is absolutely related to his evident lack of success at attracting investment. This thing would have been funded and in production quite some time ago if he and his team had been willing to cede control. I don't think this is mere shrewdness but rather an acknowledgement that he had backed himself into a corner by adopting inflexible positions as to cost ($6800) and efficiency (84 mpg) that rendered the risk-reward potential unattractive relative to other competing opportunities angels and venture would consider. If Paul were to cede control cost would go up and efficiency would go down but the odds of getting something close on the real market would increase dramatically. As it stands we will get either what Paul promised or nothing at all.