You are a customer, not an investor. I am very impressed that they are keeping a weekly email list with updates. However, do not expect them to divulge any financials to the public as they have no stockholders. Real world testing requires a real world testing team. It is highly likely that Elio has under 50 people working for the company right now compared to the thousands working for Ford or Toyota. They simply do not have the manpower or capital and unless you want the price raised, you should be able to accept the progress that they are making. If you are so doubtful about their success, you should not have put your money on a deposit.
So when Elio did divuldge their financials and they don't add up (their own #"s). Then what? That's where I am at questioning their financials................They have been around six years, and they never thought about the aerodynamics of the Elio enough that it would prevent them from getting 84mpg? Or they didn't have the money until months ago to get it into the wind tunnel? Honestly which one is the most likely? Paul Elio is an engineer, and do you want me to believe he never thought about putting that in a wind tunnel? What is the failure rate of startups without funding? Pushing back dates is due to lack of funding. You don't stop developing a vehicle because you don't have a place to manufacture it. You stop developing it when you lack the funds. And now it's just barely in time funds (deposits)..............and as I said they would be better off coming clean where they are at, it could help getting more deposits, or selling more shirts. People see the other start up's fail on a regular basis. Bricklin (SV1) did not fail due to lack of orders.
Last edited: