Let's say Elio does make the "real" offering and does hit the $25 million mark in the test-the-waters phase of the campaign (seems pretty reasonable, no?). Let's assume the drop-out rate IS 30%, and that the money / investor ratio stays the same. In other words, investors disappear proportionately to dollars.
The current ratio of investors per dollar is 1 investor per $3,857.73 in revenue.
So we will have 6,481 investors. 30% go away, leaving 4,537. They will be investing $17,500,000. Startengine.com charges $20 per transaction, so Elio's fees to them will be $90,740. In addition they'll have somewhere between 50 and 100 thousand bucks in filing fees, auditing costs, lawyers, etc etc.
So let's assume the total costs to Elio for are $190, 740. That leaves them a net of $17.3 million actual dollars. Not bad for a month's work plus filing.
I think this is a low estimate and the actual results will be higher. Here's why:
1. The campaign may well exceed goal, by how much I don't know -- if the "test the waters" phase lasts two months, it will certainly exceed $25 million before it runs out of gas, or hit's the time's-up deadline.
2. The drop-out rate is closer to 15% than to 30% (I actually believe this will be the case)
3. Actual money committed may be more per investor (or less) than the average so far. Wild card. But I think those who are serious may invest more than they're saying here -- particularly small investors (those who are now under $1000) like many of us po folks.
4. I've calculated on the basis of the number of investors driving the total (assuming an average of $3700+ dollars. If that ratio goes up because the heavy hitters stay in the game while the weaker investors tend to drop out first, the grand net total will rise. Depends on who stays and who folds.
5. Something else may happen -- some wild card. Paul Elio has a heart attack. DOE comes through with the ATVM loan. P5 actually gets 92 miles per gallon. Martians land on earth. The Chinese economy keeps tanking and takes the rest of the world with it. Any or all of these could grossly affect the results of Elio's startengine campaign. If there's a wild card -- let's hope it's a good one.
OK, back to counting the ticks on the graph ...
I suspect a significant factor in how many of these actually happen will be what stake in the company you're actually getting. $25 Million is about 10% of what they've been saying they need. Will these investors get 10% of the company/stock? A better question would be 10% of what? The 'Inc.' article they sent out earlier today implies that these shares can be sold OTC. If that's true, that could make a significant difference. If you're forced to hold on to them for a period of time (2 years, 5 years, not uncommon for employees getting stock or options in a startup), that might cause some concern. Bottom line, we're all saying "Sure, we're interested" when we know absolutely no details about what we're getting for our investment. The implication is at least one 'share' for each $250, since that's the minimum investment. But out of how many shares? $250/share for $25 Million works out to 100,000 shares for this funding round, but this certainly isn't the only one. If this is 10% of the total they need, then maybe there's 1 million total shares (or will be someday, until the issue more)? The people who've already invested are certainly getting something (Stuart Lichter and his fellow investors). The accredited investors who funded the P5 are expecting something, too. That will be the key point for me, what am I getting for my investment.
Don't get me wrong, I'm as thrilled about this as anyone. I jumped in the first day. But there are a lot of unknowns at this point.