johnsnownw
Elio Addict
I'd look into panels for my house but I'm concerned about hail... it can get damaging and often in Nebraska!
Welcome to Elio Owners! Join today, registration is easy!
You can register using your Google, Facebook, or Twitter account, just click here.I'd look into panels for my house but I'm concerned about hail... it can get damaging and often in Nebraska!
Latest craze on Batteries that I was reading was to use Lithium/Sulphur instead of Lithium/Iron
One of the Universities is working on it now and they claim that the weight of the Lithium/Sulfur Mx is half the weight of the Lithium/Iron and has 10x the Kwhr rating and charges in half half the time as current Lithium Ion Batteries.
Can't recall what University it was.
As far as the possibility of an Elio HEV or PHEV....... why not as a future endeavor.
To have more room for the Batteries, the new design could incorporate a double wheel in the Rear, making the Elio a bit wider at the back to accommodate the Batteries. a 6 or 8 Kw-hr battery could be looked into. or Keep the single rear wheel and add a few inches on each side of the Body for Batteries. A modified Gas/Elect Motor could be look into as well.
With will Power, desire and lots of cash, anything is possible
Could be a single dually......still only 3 wheels, 4 tires that would allow taking advantage of a buy 3 get 1 free sales opportunity.At least down here in the states, putting two wheels on the back would make it a 4-wheeled vehicle, thus a car, and would require bumpers and loads of other equipments and crash testings.
Yes exactly what I was thinking. With the slightly wider rear Body I am sure that a 4kWh battery could be mounted. Perhaps 2 banks of 2kWh Batteries.Could be a single dually......still only 3 wheels, 4 tires that would allow taking advantage of a buy 3 get 1 free sales opportunity.
View attachment 10823
As an all-electric, I think anything less than a 16kw battery would be insufficient for an Elio attempting to hit the 200+ mile range mark.
FWIW - Diesel-electric subs running off battery power are significantly quieter than nuke subs with operating reactors. there is a substantial amount of rotating and otherwise noise-producing equipment involved with nuclear power.If you look at the new Dolphin class subs the Israelis just bought, you'll see that advances in everything -- diesel technology, air filtration technology, battery technology, etc. -- has produced submarines that cost a fraction of what nuclear subs cost, can run much, much further and faster underwater than your granddad's sub, and are almost as quiet as a nuclear sub. .... These new subs can run their diesels underwater for periods of time, and their batteries can run their electric engines much, MUCH longer than the old-fashioned batteries.)
Lead-acid batteries are still the battery of choice for submarines. They are simple, effective, durable, and you can beat the hell out of them without too many consequences. And they don't tend to explode or catch on fire when mistreated. The hydrogen gas evolved from the operation of the battery is a well-known and easy to account for factor. The major risk is seawater contamination, which is also a known risk, and accounted for by design and procedure.
I don't expect that there will be a move away from lead-acid until someone invents some quantum leap in mass-storage batteries.
Also, lead acid batteries serve a much-needed role in submarines: ballast.