TheAsterisk!
Elio Aficionado
I've been thinking something like this for a while, once I knew the target vehicle weight, horsepower and torque. Proportional to its weight (and likely better on the aerodynamics), the Elio is slated to have about as much power and torque as my sadly-departed '99 Civic. The Civic never gave me any trouble, though it wasn't a performance machine by any stretch, and it was also fairly economical to operate and simple in design.I predict the acceleration will be fine but not fun. Like the 1.6L that was in my 2012 Veloster. 0-60 was in the 10s range similar to what the Elio predicts. Acceleration around town was fine but passing on the highway took some planning and high revs. Under normal driving it never felt like a problem. But the second year Hyundai offered the turbo that brought that time in the 7s range, about what I would expect with the Elio too.
Do not get me wrong, I think the cumulative driving experience of the Elio will be tons of fun, just not straight line acceleration.
If my very beat up Civic could do it- on an old, traditional 4-speed automatic, no less, and lacking the much-ballyhooed VTEC and its juju- then I am not at all worried about the Elio needing more power, if the targets are met. You might want to turn off their AC when you merge or pass, but that's just life with a tiny engine- no biggie.
I also want to try to keep the machine as mechanically simple and robust as can be expected for the base design. If there's no pressing need to get more power just to manage basic, utilitarian driving- and I honestly belong in the right lane where I reside, anyway - then why overstress the engine unduly?
Naturally aspirated, thanks. Things would have to be unmanageable enough for me to consider otherwise that by that point I might be contemplating another vehicle entirely, to be perfectly honest.