Here is just a little bit more of that:
"These standards will provide significant savings for consumers at the pump. Higher costs for new vehicle technology are projected to add, on average, about $1,800 for consumers who buy a new vehicle in MY 2025. Those consumers who drive their MY 2025 vehicle for its entire lifetime will save, on average, $5,700 to $7,400 (7 and 3 percent discount rates, respectively) in fuel savings, for a net lifetime savings of $3,400 to $5,000 (when compard to a vehicle meeting the MY 2016 standards). For those consumers who purchase their new MY 2025 vehicle outright, the discounted fuel savings will offset the higher vehicle cost in less than 3.5 years, and fuel savings will continue for as long as the consumer owns the vehicle."
EPA standards that require higher-mileage, cleaner-burning vehicles are NOT bunk, IMHO, but necessary to push automakers into designing constantly more efficient vehicles. Just because it is a "regulation", and/or from the EPA, does not automatically make it evil.
Well said! I don't think anyone could make an argument against the necessity of saving fuel and reducing emissions, especially not when this saves a load of money for the consumers. It's a win-win situation. Thinking of horsepower, the lowest powered car I ever drove had just 26hp: a 1970's 2CV, fun to drive, especially with the roof open...