RSchneider
Elio Addict
1 - Elio got just over 21K to put down $1K and commit to buy. By how much they raised, the bulk were $100. I mention again, it took 52 months to get to 65K. When you look at the SEC filings, they garnered approximately 44K reservations the first two years they took them. So, when you look at a production number to reach the price point (which Elio mentioned many times), thinking you were going to sell 10X of that per year, it was a stretch. Especially for a company with zero experience at car manufacturing, let along high volume. Look at the "manufacturing hell" that Tesla went through with the model 3. They were experienced at making cars, yet it bit them in the butt even though they hired some really good people to run that program.1/ I believe 18,000 depositors paid the $1,000 option? That's pretty good numbers for a low volume manufacturer, gee whiz, what I could do with that cash .... but I don't think people want to take a chance on a double whammy :-)
2/ I don't agree. I feel it was imperative for Elio to have a bespoke Autocycle class in order to get the large orders through clarification of what it is. If you had to wear a helmet, I doubt Elio would have gotten 30% of the orders he got, so I would rate that as his major coupe. A cynical person might suggest it was all part of the plan to get more money into his own pocket ...
3/ Sure, I don't want to afford the cost of crash testing, and neither do the customers want it tacked on to the end price either. I do have decades of race car prep experience and safety cage building, I believe I have demonstrated that I do care about roll over protection and side impact strength, the doors will be OEM from a car that has the legal side impact requirements built in and proven in crash testing.
But there is more than just crash testing, a car that dynamically drives better, has good forward and sideways vision, comfortable driving position, etc is always going to be a safer car due to the ability to avoid accidents.
And of course, people still choose motorcycles, an Autocycle is always going to be massive step up in safety over a motorcycle.
2 - Remember, the slingshot came out in 2014. Vanderhall in 2016. Both are low volume and people seemed to not have a problem buying them and thus, the sales never went through the roof for the work Elio did. Elio was to go in production when the Slingshot did (2014). So, get the product out there and then change the law. Elio spent way too much on marketing and lobbyists. They raised $110M, spent $36M just on the car. The remaining on everything else. Trust me, lobbyists make huge amounts of money. I know from experience.
3 - Building racecars is one thing. Building street cars is another. So for safety, a third party would test it and determine if it's actually safe according to that countrys' safety standard. This is why cars like a Porsche 992 GT3Cup has a completely different safety system as opposed to a street 992 GT3, yet Porsche makes both of them. So, it's OK for low volume but as soon as it goes big, the BEX will be tested by someone like the IIHS. At this point, we can only go by your word that it'll be safe. Here in the US we have what they call PE's (Professional Engineers). They have to be licensed and sign off on projects that mostly deal with safety. Not just the US has this (PE's) but it's a check and balance to keep people honest. Its not perfect, but works most of the time.
As for autocycle, what has been mentioned here many times over the years, they choose autocycle because they are getting too old to operate a motorcycle safely. Then, they could drive a car as an autocycle is just a car missing a wheel. Then it becomes, being different and the fan base ensues. Maybe you need to have a survey to ask about the age of your respondents. You might be in for a surprise.