Ty
Elio Addict
Good point. The tube frame made sense to get a prototype built before you had any real funding but it made no sense when planning to build a ton of vehicles.Let me put it to you this way. Name me one high volume company in the last 100 years that has produced a tube frame car. I'm talking about at least 100K/year. Then I ask you this. Why buy a massive sheetmetal stamping operation if you were never going to use it. I'm not just talking about the stamping, but the welding too. If you ever see a tube frame line, it's CNC benders, laser cutters and then a complex MIG welding system. Elio was going to have to sell off all of the GM steel stamping and welding equipment but only sold basic old stuff and not the big things (you had to see it on their ebay site many years ago). It seems odd to me that they just spent money buying equipment that they were never going to use, yet did buy it. On top of that, they were very animate on how their system was superior over a unibody and steel body up until just after they raised $16M. In 2016 alone Elio spent $26m in R&D and the major change was a complete redesign of the chassis and body. Elio pushed the tube frame from October 2008 to around April 2016. So it took them over 7 years to realize they made a mistake? When nobody does what they were doing, even for junker Indian cars that could never be sold in the US.
You have to look at the reality of the situation. Elio either knew they needed to make the car into a unibody (which I bet 100 people tole them up to that point) or there was a dream that a tube frame with a SMC body was the best way to go (if SMC was a good choice for the panels, then GM would not only use them on the Corvette but for the cheapest ones as GM is the master of saving cost).