Is this saying only established companies showing this profitability can go public with an IPO? This would mean going public would be of no help in initial funding of EM. IPOs would only help EM expand after it is already established and in operation.Thanks for the post, karl. We should refer back to this every time the discussion relates to anxiety over the lack of an IPO. In particular, I quote from the second citation from inc.com :
"The NASDAQ Global Market requires companies have income from continuing operations before income taxes in the latest fiscal year or in two of the last three fiscal years of $1 million or more. The NASDAQ Capital Market has a lower barrier to entry, requiring net income from continuing operations in the latest fiscal year or in two of the last three fiscal years of at least $750,000. Meanwhile, the NYSE's American Stock Exchange (AMEX) requires pre-tax income of $750,000 in the latest fiscal year or in two of the three most recent fiscal years.
The exchanges also offer alternative listing standards based on cash flow, market cap, and revenue for larger companies not meeting the pre-tax earnings' tests."
Paul Elio said at Saint Francis University he would go public only if he had to. This sounded like he would go public to get the money for initial establishment of the company.
Now I am confused.