Welcome to Elio Owners! Join today, registration is easy!
You can register using your Google, Facebook, or Twitter account, just click here.Okay... So what does this mean? Is it to use as leverage for the loan to show interest?
Note all the qualifiers. Please remember that should this funding be pursued (highly likely), this will be a PUBLIC offering. This means it is open to the public at large. Each participant thus far has merely provided a convenient e-mail address to receive the actual solicitation in the form of a prospectus.
Noted, Thanks for the explanation.
In contrast with EM reservations, there is no line you (and I) are standing in. In a standard IPO, if the offering is anticipated to be oversubscribed, the issuer can increase the number of shares offered; this is what Facebook did. I have not seen any guidance as to whether the A+ regulation would permit this.
I don't know.
Significantly, the "testing the waters" phase began with a goal of the maximum permitted by the regulation, i.e., $50 million. Did EM receive guidance that this likely could not be achieved in the time they allotted? Now that would be a good question to have answered. And most importantly, does this mean that this potential offering would only raise half as much capital as was initially hoped for?
My understanding is that the $25mm covers the testing as well as construction. Sure hope that's the case.They did not raise $25 million. They got a list of folks who "say" they will commit x amount of dollars and those folks cannot be held to their offer. Interested in why it takes one million dollars per car to get the next 25 built.
I may have this wrong, but my understanding is that Reg A+ is not the same thing as a "public offering" because there remain some qualifications for the investor -- max purchase is no more than 10% of net worth (minus house) or 10% of gross income, whichever is greater. The SEC authorizes the company seeking funds to contact those who expressed interest and directly solicit stock purchases from these people. Moreover, the shares issued may not behave like common stock; they may, for instance, not have voting privileges, which would be important to EM. They may carry a restriction on how long they must be held before they may be sold. Etc -- and we won't know until the formal solicitation is made.Happy to see EM achieved their revised goal of $25 million expressions of interest in the "testing the waters" phase of this potential stock offering. Note all the qualifiers. Please remember that should this funding be pursued (highly likely), this will be a PUBLIC offering. This means it is open to the public at large. Each participant thus far has merely provided a convenient e-mail address to receive the actual solicitation in the form of a prospectus.
In contrast with EM reservations, there is no line you (and I) are standing in. In a standard IPO, if the offering is anticipated to be oversubscribed, the issuer can increase the number of shares offered; this is what Facebook did. I have not seen any guidance as to whether the A+ regulation would permit this.
Significantly, the "testing the waters" phase began with a goal of the maximum permitted by the regulation, i.e., $50 million. Did EM receive guidance that this likely could not be achieved in the time they allotted? Now that would be a good question to have answered. And most importantly, does this mean that this potential offering would only raise half as much capital as was initially hoped for?