But what happens when that on-board computer decides to have a bad day and you're expecting it to work?My daughter in law just bought the smaller Subaru model with the Eyesight. I have to say, after taking a test drive and seeing what it can do, I'd have a hard time buying a new 4-wheel vehicle without such a system. The safety implications are astounding.
We pulled out onto a traffic-choked interstate and set the speed for 60. Could we go 60? Nope, but Eyesight kept us at a safe distance from the next car and moving along at the speed of traffic. When another car entered down a ramp, it automatically slid back to maintain a safe distance from the new car. As traffic thinned and sped up, we gradually reached 60. And when traffic moved faster, we stayed at 60. When things thickened up again, it brought us right down to the speed of traffic, keeping a few car lengths back. We even turned off onto a ramp and I drove right up behind a car at a stoplight without ever touching the brake. It was just amazing.
It showed me that self-driving cars, at least for the Interstate, can't be far off.
That's one of the items that bother me on today's cars. A number of them are computer dependent and those computers have not hit a real consistent operational rate yet. Friend of mine bought a new Mercedes SL550, she drove it 2 months, then it sat in the shop for 4 months, she got it back, drove it 2 weeks, another month in the shop, back one more time, it died on the way home. She told them to stuff it, they asked for another chance, gave her a top of the line BMW and within a month the Beemer had computer problems. These were not cheap cars. German cars are usually way over engineered, these were too, but they are also very computer dependent.
So what does she drive now? A used 1998 Honda Accord that has been bulletproof and she took the extra money to upgrade some nav gear in her jet (she has a Citation M2)