The more Es the faster the testing process with so many varied tests mentioned. I suspect some tests will be repetitive and require some time to complete. Also, the 2 or 3 Es for ride & drive events and marketing are the Es I look forward to.Back on topic for a moment (foolish of me, I know), despite EM's blog post today, I still don't quite see how they need 25 "or so" E-vehicles. I would love to see the diagram that explains how each E-car is going to be used. I bet it looks like a spider's web! I'm really curious as to where they're going to do all this testing. I'm pretty sure the crash-tests themselves are going to need third-party observation, if not actually doing the work by a third party; otherwise someone or other (and we can guess who) will accuse EM of cooking the safety books.
The other tests, safety-related or not, simply make very good sense to do, if you're at all conscientious. I find the idea of ergonomic testing as a safety-related issue very interesting -- and very appealing. Making sure the shift lever doesn't interfere with your coffee cup holder -- a critical issue (especially if you're Mr. Elio). That same sort of testing would be, for instance, where you might catch glare from the rear-view mirrors being popped back into the driver's eyes -- definitely a safety issue, very hard to catch unless you're testing for it. A car starts to pull up beside you, headlights on high, and --- ZAP! you get a sudden bright flash, distracting to say the least!
So, if they're going to multi-task the various chassis numbers (E3 or E8, for instance) in the tests they are used for, why do they need so many of them? Enquiring minds want to know -- but suspect about 5 of them will be rolling to the malls of America long before we drive our early production cars away from Shreveport.