Welcome to Elio Owners! Join today, registration is easy!
You can register using your Google, Facebook, or Twitter account, just click here.I would love to hear a defense attorney rebut a prosecution argument that "the choice of these bullets show that the defendant not only wanted to defend himself but also wanted to cause the maximum amount of pain and suffering to whomever he shot". I realize that it is better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6 but geeze........ Italics just showed up for some reasonLooks like something that would have a rough time going through leather, or a wool-lined denim jacket, while still maintaining enough force to cause a debilitating wound. Would love to see some ballistic data comparing them to JHPs and FMJs.
I would love to hear a defense attorney rebut a prosecution argument that "the choice of these bullets show that the defendant not only wanted to defend himself but also wanted to cause the maximum amount of pain and suffering to whomever he shot". I realize that it is better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6 but geeze........ Italics just showed up for some reason
Two words. "Double Tap". If I ever HAD to shoot an intruder. they would not live to sue. That's just self preservation in today's legal world. I know that sounds cruel, but I won't be sued because someone was wounded breaking into my house, and lived to hire a lawyer.
So true. It's gone. Sometimes I forget I'm not just talking to friends here. Thanks for reminding me.It's entirely up to you, but I sure wouldn't want that statement on the internet just "dying" to come back and haunt...
In the remote and unfortunate chance that anything like you've just described would ever happen.
Leaving this post up sure doesn't seem like effective legal self preservation to me.
The thread's getting a little dicey and seems headed in a dark direction anyway.
Maybe we should steer the path back away from that specific topic.