Johnny Acree
Elio Addict
- Joined
- May 12, 2014
- Messages
- 1,530
- Reaction score
- 2,573
That may be it, but it looks like the group2 idea is undefined at the moment. But I get what you mean.
We have at least 3 groups to consider. And these access one of either reservations or pre-orders.
Group 1: everyone up to 65k reservations.
+ > Delivery "Sorted" first by all in or not,
+ > Then sorted by reservation amount, All-In $1k first, All-In $500 second .. etc. (as stated previously )
Group 2: everyone after the group1 program ended and until EM starts taking pre-orders.
+ > Will likely not have a 'committed' requirement or offer.
+ > Price will be set at $7300 or slightly more.
+ > Will this be reservations or pre-orders?
+ - Could go either way.
+ > If reservations and still has levels, will the 1000's from group 2 be mixed in with the delivery order with group 1?
+ - I gather we all think mixing would be unjust. And does seem unlikely from a business relations point of view.
+ -- but yes, EM could choose to keep the Group as part of group 1.
+ > Will there be level amounts like before?
+ - EM could very well just adopt one all-in reservation amount, but this amount depends on their desire for money.
+ -- let me guess, it depends on the ATVM approval.
+ > Will there be a All-In vs not?
+ - Seems to be no need to complicate things with a two-way program, it will be one or the other.
+ -- Most likely all-in only. If so, this could solidify that Group 2 is separate from Group 1.
Group 3: After the reservation program is over, I expect the following to be the case;
+ > first come first serve
+ > one fixed deposit amount. Probably $100.
+ > Price will be set at $7300 or slightly more, could be more than the Group 2 offer..
+ - price can not go above what the EM business model suggests.
+ -- I'd say very max at well under $9k, best to stay under $7900 base pricing.
+ > Very carefully not called a reservation, now a pre-order.
+ - The word 'Order' has an implied commitment for both sides in sales.
+ -- On an 'order' EM must deliver but the customer has simply put the deposit at risk.
+ > Start group3 close to or after production actually starts.
+ -- this is because it is a commitment. And therefore the Production must be a reliable dependency.
Edited- Note: You need to understand, in the case of most any change to the on-going terms of the reservation program, those people can not be easily mixed in with the prior group, since this would undermine the prior terms and therefore could be considered a breaking of the contract. Such a case could force a return of the all-in deposits in a class action law-suit.
I was thinking along these same lines late yesterday, but no matter what EM wants to do. They are bound by the original terms of agreement. I think that is what EM will stick to till production starts.