No way is Mark stupid enough the make a mistake like that.
Clearly you have never asked my wife for her opinion of me.
Welcome to Elio Owners! Join today, registration is easy!
You can register using your Google, Facebook, or Twitter account, just click here.No way is Mark stupid enough the make a mistake like that.
You really make it tough..... I can think of several smart-ass responses to that, but I'll control myself. I'm sure she's a lucky lady.Clearly you have never asked my wife for her opinion of me.
There are published tests of the steering characteristics of various platforms with their best castor angles.Cars driving in reverse of course have negative caster, and forklifts have zero caster, both that cause that unstable feeling.
Rear steering is ok with the correct and necessary stable positive caster, but isn't safe when a car gets out of control, which it will at a likely lower speed because of course the weight is being swung around on a larger centrifugal arc, and also no way to contain it if it's force becomes greater than the tire's grip.
You've seen and inspected the SOLO up close, what sort of steering system did they used?There are published tests of the steering characteristics of various platforms with their best castor angles.
The location of power to the wheels were also considered.
These test were focused on the oversteering and understeering that was 'felt' at various side force levels.
This was partly to explain the problems that the Dymaxion rear-steered vehicle encountered. Basically
a couple layouts are very problematic. The oversteering and understeering can swap or become suddenly
very pronounced in some combinations.
Rear steering was very bad in all power arrangements at anything but low speed. Caster angles could only
mitigate the problem just so much.
Powering a single wheel of three was also bad, particularly if a single front wheel. They didn't try 1 of 4.
The Dymaxion had both a single powered rear wheel at one point and it steered too. The only thing this car
in that arrangement could do safely was park in parallel spots, if never exceeding 10mph.
I have seen demo film of it doing fast transitions on roads to show how safe it was. But you could see wild
jerks while it moved that do not impress me much. They scare me in fact.
Of the tests, our BEX project is implementing the safest combination, below a nominal power level.
It is very boring if you like racing.
The only better layout for safety might be is a 45/55 mid-engine and/or all wheel drive.
That one can take high power, even for racing.
And pray tell, why not?????All I can say is that I would never buy a car with rear wheel steering.
All I can say is that I would never buy a car with rear wheel steering.
I remember those cars, and the rear steer they used was a little different, it would turn one way at low speed, and the opposite way at speed, it was a rather different type of rear wheel steer, it also had a lock out. But all of this steering it would do was computer controlled, and it worked in conjunction with the front wheels steering. It was a rather "different" type of steering, and the driver really had no control over how they were turning. Ahh yes, I remember that system, it was a nightmare to work on. And when it had problems, it was set to lock on straight, if it ran into problem. And it only turned a few degrees.Fun and games, but there was never any intention of creating rear steering.
The 1980s Honda Prelude and Mazda 626 sold quite well with assisted rear steering by the way, and the Mitsubishi VR4 won some World Rallys with it ...
How big is the fuel tank? One of the things I wish my Honda Fit had was a bigger fuel tank.The fuel tank is mounted, but not.
I got a bit complicated with it, took a step back and realised how easy I could make it, cut out what I had made up, grabbed 2 lengths of angle iron, 4 holes and job done.
View attachment 25387
I will design and laser a more appropriate mounting system, but this is the foundation of it, i.e. KISS.
.