Welcome to Elio Owners! Join today, registration is easy!
You can register using your Google, Facebook, or Twitter account, just click here.it may tune the timing as well as the shift pointsAn Eco button on a standard manual transmission?
How's that supposed to work again?
Ty, didn't Jerome or someone else from EM later say that the 83mpg that Jeff quoted...I never like when they pronounce it EL-EE-OH. It's EE-LEE-OH, people.
Points Jeff Johnston made:
Analysis - 83 MPG and they are still working to get to 84.
Well, I was going to do a point-by-point analysis before I realized I've already seen it and we've already analyzed it to death. Anyway, it's a decent video but Johnston mis-speaks a few times in there but other than that, it's a good video. (the AMT and the MT versions of the Elio will be produced concurrently though he states otherwise)
Take a magnet along with you (make sure it's plastic coated, or cloth covered, we don't want scratches) and check the body panels.I will be there on Monday, 11/21.
Questions:
- Jeff Johnson, VP of Engineering- "We were running with SMC, but we changed over to steel."
Ty, didn't Jerome or someone else from EM later say that the 83mpg that Jeff quoted...
Was still only based on a simulation and was not a real-life figure obtained by a real vehicle?
Almost like EM wanted to make sure that no-one got the wrong idea from Jeff's quote?
That's good to hear. Though 83 MPG is nothing to sneeze at.This week I asked an executive how they were doing on 84 miles per gallon. I was told in response that's not an issue. no detail.
The real problem, if thee is one, is with the city mileage figure. The only way to go after that is to lighten the vehicle, hence the change to steel panels. Whether they're going to make their 49 city, I don't know. If they don't, the only way to get 61 combined is to further improve the highway mpg.That's good to hear. Though 83 MPG is nothing to sneeze at.