No, A selfish public liked a "pet" that required no attention or effort.Because of the dramatic shortage of cats and dogs at the time?
Welcome to Elio Owners! Join today, registration is easy!
You can register using your Google, Facebook, or Twitter account, just click here.No, A selfish public liked a "pet" that required no attention or effort.Because of the dramatic shortage of cats and dogs at the time?
No, A selfish public liked a "pet" that required no attention or effort.
There definitely is a series of conditions that left the 3 wheeler out of the mix. In the early days of the automobile, it was about the cost as much as anything. And the power and speed was not as important. As we can see by the postings, small cars and three wheelers were widespread. Just about any garage jockey thought he could start a company. And many could and did.
By the 60's power and speed got bigger, companies got bigger, expectations got bigger, and at the same time the perception of a do-it-all vehicle became common place. The post WWII had the ideal of a 4 person family at minimum. Open top vehicles, exposed to the elements were out. And in America the highway system seemed to encourage a land-yacht mentality.
The OPEC ordeal of the 70's only put a slight bend in it for smaller cars. Technical innovation enabled the re-invention of the economy 4 seat automobile. But 3 wheelers were not revisited. (except for the DIY/Kit world, there was motion there) Moving past into the 90's, America went super-sized into SUV territory.
In some ways the pre-50 and pre-40 autocycles were too successful. The public was a bit tired of that being 'my only car' and up scaled their desires. And as a manufacturer, why would you sell less of a car, when you can sell more? At the same time government regulation, insurance, corporate marketing etc, pushed the autocycle to the fringe. And cars have become more expensive and more complex.
Many people with a hankering for a retro vehicle had moved to motorcycles, even if this is not a cheap vehicle, with the latest exception of Chinese scooters.
So now, at this point in time a hole has been left open. So long as one realizes, it's OK to buy a car that isn't for all-in-one use. But today in America, the old autocycles with only urban speed capability won't do it. You need safe freeway capability, AC and enough power. And it needed to be cost effective, for it to make sense. Large investment only big companies could make was required to start such a product, and there is no viable motivator to do so.
You can see how this works when looking at the adoption of the Smart Car sized platform. No American distributor would sell that, until they felt they need to. Smart car even trying was very much the exception. Once SC did it for a number of years, that got the others interested.
So only after Elio is successful, will there be any motivation for a larger manufacturer to attempt an Elio layout and pricing structure. As long as Elio is able to keep the price low, others will be very reluctant to even try. On the other hand if EM gets very profitable, even if only though options and add-ons, others will get very interested indeed. But by then EM will have a 3-5year head start.
Thanks David! I really liked that car. It did have a very poor turning radius. Front end was a little plain. I'll bet the range sucked, but adequate for round town in those days. Other than that it was ahead of it's time. Makes me wonder what the relative pricing was.