RUCRAYZE
Elio Addict
well, XI:XXVI, night all
Welcome to Elio Owners! Join today, registration is easy!
You can register using your Google, Facebook, or Twitter account, just click here.Hmmm....From a company the produces the static cling stickers like the one I had. And come to think of it, it was on the inside of my back window, not outside. Might have to use whatever material wraps are made of to get any kind of durability.
"Static clings are easily removed since they do not have adhesive, but can lose their ability to cling over time and may need to be re-installed or even replaced. Static Clings are not recommended for vehicles and are not weather resistant."
Then shouldn't the nacelles be mounted above and outboard of the trunk lid, and swap out the hood for a cool saucer section?
Also one thing that I forgot to mention about the nacelles, is that they were placed as far away from the crew as possible due to the anti-matter radiation that is produced from them. Also, if there was ever a plasma leak (which happened on occasion in battles), it would flow away from the ship as they maneuvered. If what I have learned holds true, if the plasma from the nacelles ever came in contact with the anti-matter in the warp core, it would cause an almost instantaneous warp core breach. Therefore, I think the most logical place for them to be placed on the Elio would be the wheel frames. Sure they are at the front, but I haven't found anything that suggests that the nacelles have to be in the rear. I do know that the deflector array just has to project the field far enough in front of the ship that when the go to warp, dust and micro-particles within space won't do any damage to the vessel. If you went warp 1 (the exact same speed of light) and you hit a rock about a centimeter in width, the damage it would cause would be equivalent to a class VI photon torpedo exploding inside the ship. With this rupture, and hull displacement, it would throw the star ship out of warp. The structural integrity would then receive micro fractures all along the hull and eventually (usually before the escape pods would be able to launch) the ship would literally be torn apart.
I know this is probably irrelevant information, but I think this would help those who are interested in making their Elio look a little more Trekkie.
Also one thing that I forgot to mention about the nacelles, is that they were placed as far away from the crew as possible due to the anti-matter radiation that is produced from them. Also, if there was ever a plasma leak (which happened on occasion in battles), it would flow away from the ship as they maneuvered. If what I have learned holds true, if the plasma from the nacelles ever came in contact with the anti-matter in the warp core, it would cause an almost instantaneous warp core breach. Therefore, I think the most logical place for them to be placed on the Elio would be the wheel frames. Sure they are at the front, but I haven't found anything that suggests that the nacelles have to be in the rear. I do know that the deflector array just has to project the field far enough in front of the ship that when the go to warp, dust and micro-particles within space won't do any damage to the vessel. If you went warp 1 (the exact same speed of light) and you hit a rock about a centimeter in width, the damage it would cause would be equivalent to a class VI photon torpedo exploding inside the ship. With this rupture, and hull displacement, it would throw the star ship out of warp. The structural integrity would then receive micro fractures all along the hull and eventually (usually before the escape pods would be able to launch) the ship would literally be torn apart.
I know this is probably irrelevant information, but I think this would help those who are interested in making their Elio look a little more Trekkie.
http://www.pbsvb.com/customer-industries/aerospace/aircraft-engines/tj-100-turbojet-engine
I am not sure about warp field generators, but this would fit it the trunk area, with appropriate structural attachment and a bit of plumbing and ductwork, it would provide an unique driving experience. ...coyote-like, to say the least - testing on a long, straight, empty road is suggested. A helmet, fire suit and a good attorney's phone number is highly suggested. Will probably void the factory warranty. Your mileage will definitely vary.
(Seriously, if you try anything like this, angle the thrust vector down by 2 or 3 degrees while under maximum load - don't ask...)
http://www.pbsvb.com/customer-industries/aerospace/aircraft-engines/tj-100-turbojet-engine
I am not sure about warp field generators, but this would fit it the trunk area, with appropriate structural attachment and a bit of plumbing and ductwork, it would provide an unique driving experience. ...coyote-like, to say the least - testing on a long, straight, empty road is suggested. A helmet, fire suit and a good attorney's phone number is highly suggested. Will probably void the factory warranty. Your mileage will definitely vary.
(Seriously, if you try anything like this, angle the thrust vector down by 2 or 3 degrees while under maximum load - don't ask...)