Another "non-optimal" Review

[Coss]

Curious what the reporter has in his stable that made him such and expert to be able to tell me what not to drive.....

1972 Dodge Aspen, one of the original K cars.

 

[Ekh]

There's one thing that's very interesting, right at the start of the video -- 17 seconds in -- at the point labeled -2:10 -- Jerome says "The vehicle gets over 84 mpg," slight emphasis on the word "over."

Over 84 mpg? Did he just let slip a truly fabulous test result, or was it just a slip of the tongue, period? Hmmmm ... or maybe WOW!

 

[Elio Amazed]

There's one thing that's very interesting, right at the start of the video -- 17 seconds in -- at the point labeled -2:10 -- Jerome says "The vehicle gets over 84 mpg," slight emphasis on the word "over."

Over 84 mpg? Did he just let slip a truly fabulous test result, or was it just a slip of the tongue, period? Hmmmm ... or maybe WOW!

Up to now, it's been "up to" or "targeted".
Curiouser and Curiouser.

 

[Ekh]

He may have just misspoken. The reviewer didn't recognize the importance of that statement and follow up. Amateur night . Again.

 

[BADBOY]

He said little negative that made any impact. Small cars usually have bumpier ride. Who cares if he smiles? Some of us act like folks are talking about our child. Chill. I don't get why Paul allows folks like this with minimal audience to test drive, at least now when better choices can be utilized.