booboo
Elio Addict
The Elgin would have been okay with me if the increments were smaller. I like to be able to tell if I am going 45 or 47. The Tach and Speed in the E1c look to have enough room between the round numbers so one can tell exact rpm and speed. Also with an analog gauge it is easy to see approximate readings out of the corner of your eye, with digital you have to look directly at it and think the number.This is what I don't understand. The numbers are the same size. With the Elgin you have to look in one location to read the time (or in this cases, the tachometer or speedometer). So is it easier to "look" for the pointy arm thingy as it moves in an arch, to find the number it's pointing at. This is rather than looking in one location? Or does the pointer arm/hand make the number look bigger? Or is it the staring part which is critical in reading a number of the same size, which isn't moving?![]()
http://forums.watchuseek.com/f2/what-do-you-think-about-analog-vs-digital-display-383696.html
Last edited: