• Welcome to Elio Owners! Join today, registration is easy!

    You can register using your Google, Facebook, or Twitter account, just click here.

Recommended Engine Oil

skygazer6033

Elio Addict
Joined
Jul 6, 2014
Messages
683
Reaction score
2,224
Location
Splendora, Tx
In all of the pictures and animations I've seen as well as what I've read it seems the Elio iav engine has flat tappet cam followers rather than the roller followers most modern engines have. This brings up a question on the best oil to use to promote valve train longevity. A little oil history lesson here. Back in 2006 I believe the EPA mandated the amount of the oil additive compound Zinc-Dialkyl-Dithio-Phosphate be reduced by a considerable amount because they felt it was contributing to catalytic converter failure. The reason ZDDP was put in oil in the first place was to increase wear protection in metal to metal sliding contact areas of the engine (cam to lifter). Since the Elio iav engine is an updated 20 yo design but apparently not updated with roller valve lifters does anyone (Elio or IAV) know of a requirement to use special oil or additives? This has been a problem with using modern oils in classic cars.
 

goofyone

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Messages
3,756
Reaction score
18,664
Location
Cumming, GA
In all of the pictures and animations I've seen as well as what I've read it seems the Elio iav engine has flat tappet cam followers rather than the roller followers most modern engines have. This brings up a question on the best oil to use to promote valve train longevity. A little oil history lesson here. Back in 2006 I believe the EPA mandated the amount of the oil additive compound Zinc-Dialkyl-Dithio-Phosphate be reduced by a considerable amount because they felt it was contributing to catalytic converter failure. The reason ZDDP was put in oil in the first place was to increase wear protection in metal to metal sliding contact areas of the engine (cam to lifter). Since the Elio iav engine is an updated 20 yo design but apparently not updated with roller valve lifters does anyone (Elio or IAV) know of a requirement to use special oil or additives? This has been a problem with using modern oils in classic cars.

This has been discussed and debunked directly by GM and while they do state that ZDP has been reduced they point out that there is still enough in standard modern oil to protect against this issue. Modern oils must even pass two tests designed to make sure this is not an issue.

The Starburst Oil Myth -- The latest myth promoted by the antique and collector car press says that new Starburst/ API SM engine oils (called Starburst for the shape of the symbol on the container) (fig. 3 and 4) are bad for older engines because the amount of anti-wear additive in them has been reduced. The anti-wear additive being discussed is zinc dithiophosphate (ZDP).

[Broken External Image]

[Broken External Image]


Before debunking this myth, we need to look at the history of ZDP usage. For over 60 years, ZDP has been used as an additive in engine oils to provide wear protection and oxidation stability.

ZDP was first added to engine oil to control copper/lead bearing corrosion. Oils with a phosphorus level in the 0.03% range passed a corrosion test introduced in 1942.

In the mid-1950s, when the use of high-lift camshafts increased the potential for scuffing and wear, the phosphorus level contributed by ZDP was increased to the 0.08% range.

In addition, the industry developed a battery of oil tests (called sequences), two of which were valve-train scuffing and wear tests.

A higher level of ZDP was good for flat-tappet valve-train scuffing and wear, but it turned out that more was not better. Although break-in scuffing was reduced by using more phosphorus, longer-term wear increased when phosphorus rose above 0.14%. And, at about 0.20% phosphorus, the ZDP started attacking the grain boundaries in the iron, resulting in camshaft spalling.

By the 1970s, increased antioxidancy was needed to protect the oil in high-load engines, which otherwise could thicken to a point where the engine could no longer pump it. Because ZDP was an inexpensive and effective antioxidant, it was used to place the phosphorus level in the 0.10% range.

However, phosphorus is a poison for exhaust catalysts. So, ZDP levels have been reduced over the last 10-15 years. It's now down to a maximum of 0.08% for Starburst oils. This was supported by the introduction of modern ashless antioxidants that contain no phosphorus.

Enough history. Let's get back to the myth that Starburst oils are no good for older engines. The argument put forth is that while these oils work perfectly well in modern, gasoline engines equipped with roller camshafts, they will cause catastrophic wear in older engines equipped with flat-tappet camshafts.

The facts say otherwise.

Backward compatability was of great importance when the Starburst oil standards were developed by a group of experts from the OEMs, oil companies, and oil additive companies. In addition, multiple oil and additive companies ran no-harm tests on older engines with the new oils; and no problems were uncovered.

The new Starburst specification contains two valve-train wear tests. All Starburst oil formulations must pass these two tests.

- Sequence IVA tests for camshaft scuffing and wear using a single overhead camshaft engine with slider finger (not roller) followers.

- Sequence IIIG evaluates cam and lifter wear using a V6 engine with a flat-tappet system, similar to those used in the 1980s (fig. 5).

[Broken External Image]

Those who hold onto the myth are ignoring the fact that the new Starburst oils contain about the same percentage of ZDP as the oils that solved the camshaft scuffing and wear issues back in the 1950s. (True, they do contain less ZDP than the oils that solved the oil thickening issues in the 1960s, but that's because they now contain high levels of ashless antioxidants not commercially available in the 1960s.)

Despite the pains taken in developing special flat-tappet camshaft wear tests that these new oils must pass and the fact that the ZDP level of these new oils is comparable to the level found necessary to protect flat-tappet camshafts in the past, there will still be those who want to believe the myth that new oils will wear out older engines.

Like other myths before it, history teaches us that it will probably take 60 or 70 years for this one to die also.

- Thanks to Bob Olree - GM Powertrain Fuels and Lubricants Group

http://www.archivedsites.com/techlink/2007/12/
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom