I respect that. What else do I want? EM as a start up company with a 2016 production schedule should have one production prototype built or in the process of being built that would make that date seem more credible to an investor with deep pockets. The history of delays is not in EM's best interest when it comes to private funding.Sorry Rickb, but your logic escapes me on start-up companies criteria. How many "start-up companies" are "far enough along" to have a product to sell? ZERO...They're start-up companies by definition, otherwise they wouldn't be trying to attract investor funding. All they (Elio) need is an idea for a product that is marketable...that they have. A tangible prototype to give possible buyers, and/or investors something touch, sit in, and drive [if you're one of the lucky ones]. Proof that there is great interest in their product...got that too. They have a literal "who's who" of automotive component suppliers interested in doing business with them, a factory, complete with every piece of equipment to build it, in a town, Shreveport, loaded with former UAW workers chompin' at the bit to build something. All the design modeling done, and crash simulations to project/predict survivability, and computer data to back it up. A functional prototype engine that's in the middle of testing, and a BoD of well known people. What else do you want?
I'm going to have to respectfully disagree. If I was an 'accredited investor' (fit the criteria until 2008 did a number on my savings plan), they'd have my 15k right now.
I consider a $15K investment today as providing EM venture capital with fairly high risk. I am pleasantly surprised EM has gotten this close to production as a follower since 2008. What else do I want? My Elio please.